GitHub[225K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

  1. Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.8 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder70/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder67/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$0.47/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
219K
962K
Completed sessions
2,607,179
125,729,117
Token share
0.19%
14.1%
Tokens
2.6T+127%
189T+100%
SEP 12NOV 6
SEP 12NOV 6
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.2%9.7K user-weeks
72.3%14K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.